Letters to the Editor - Spring 1994

By Richard Estrada
Published in The Social Contract
Volume 4, Number 3 (Spring 1994)
Issue theme: "End of the migration epoch?"


I would like to clarify some statements ascribed to me in Mr. Robert McConnell's article, 'Conference Ethics of Immigration,' (The Social Contract, Winter 1993-94), and amplify upon others.

? While my remarks did include my opinion that 'the American family needs time to heal itself,' and while I oppose the current high levels of immigration, I do not support a moratorium on immigration.

? While I did say that over 100 million people today live in countries other than those in which they were born, I did not mean to suggest that they would all move here if they could (though several million would).

? While the United States takes in many refugees, I stated that this country annually resettles more immigrants and refugees than the rest of the world combined.

? While I suggested that the U.S. should emphasize the skills of newcomers, and reduce the emphasis on family reunification, I believe that the reunification of immediate family members - spouses, sons and daughters, - should be retained.

My reference to the present policy generating a 'false sense of entitlement' referred to other than immediate family members who are caught in a vast backlog. Specifically, immigration experts have suggested that their technical eligibility to immigrate legally in the distant future may encourage them to immigrate illegally today.


Richard Estrada

Irving, Texas

Copyright 2007 The Social Contract Press, 445 E Mitchell Street, Petoskey, MI 49770; ISSN 1055-145X
(Article copyrights extend to the first date the article was published in The Social Contract)